Critique of Florida's Approach to Black History Education

August 4, 2023

By Christopher Blair, Ed.D.

 

Introduction:

Florida's decision to incorporate the notion that some Black people benefited from slavery due to the acquisition of useful skills within its black history standards is a contentious topic that merits thoughtful consideration. While the intention may be to offer a more nuanced perspective, this approach is fraught with ethical and historical concerns that undermine its potential educational value. It is crucial to recognize the complexities of this matter and address why this perspective is problematic within the context of black history education.

 

Historical Injustice and Moral Dilemma:

Advocating that some Black individuals benefited from slavery by acquiring skills disregards the profound suffering, dehumanization, and systemic injustice endured by enslaved people. The horrors of slavery cannot be whitewashed by highlighting instances of skills acquisition. Focusing solely on this aspect creates a moral dilemma, as it downplays the pervasive and long-lasting effects of slavery on the lives of Black people, their families, and their descendants. Such an approach risks perpetuating a distorted narrative that minimizes the severity of historical atrocities.

 

Distorted Focus and Missed Opportunities:

Presenting the idea that skills acquisition could justify any form of benefit from slavery shifts the focus away from the larger picture. The primary emphasis should be on the resilience, resistance, and contributions of Black individuals despite the oppressive circumstances they faced. By dwelling on skills acquisition, educators risk missing the opportunity to highlight the rich tapestry of Black history, achievements, and cultural contributions that emerged against all odds. This approach perpetuates an incomplete and misleading narrative that underrepresents the breadth of Black experiences.

 

Perpetuating Stereotypes and Erasure:

Florida's approach risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes by implying that skill acquisition somehow justifies or mitigates the suffering of enslaved people. This could inadvertently reinforce the deeply entrenched belief that Black individuals are inherently subservient or that they owe a debt of gratitude for their historical mistreatment. Additionally, this perspective contributes to the erasure of the countless Black activists, abolitionists, and leaders who fought relentlessly against slavery and its legacy, often at great personal risk. Downplaying their contributions diminishes the agency and impact of these remarkable individuals.

 

Alternative Approaches to Comprehensive Education:

Rather than emphasizing individual instances of skills acquisition, a more comprehensive and empathetic approach to black history education would be to explore the broader context of systemic racism, resistance, and resilience. Students should be exposed to the stories of enslaved individuals who resisted oppression, fought for their freedom, and contributed to the progress of society despite overwhelming odds. By focusing on these aspects, students can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of history and the ongoing struggle for equality, fostering empathy and critical thinking skills.

 

Conclusion:

While it is essential to approach history from multiple angles, Florida's approach to including the notion of Black people benefiting from slavery due to skills acquisition oversimplifies a deeply complex and painful historical narrative. This perspective risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes, erasing the contributions of countless activists, and diverting attention from the broader context of systemic racism and resistance. A more balanced and comprehensive approach to black history education is necessary to ensure that students gain a nuanced understanding of the challenges, triumphs, and ongoing struggles of Black individuals throughout history.

 

About the author